<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Fp32 on Tenu Tech Brief</title>
    <link>https://cluster-site.onrender.com/tags/fp32/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Fp32 on Tenu Tech Brief</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.146.0</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 06:04:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://cluster-site.onrender.com/tags/fp32/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>[ConstantFolding] Why are FP32 calls folded in double-precision?</title>
      <link>https://cluster-site.onrender.com/posts/constantfolding-why-are-fp32-calls-folded-in-double-precision/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 13:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://cluster-site.onrender.com/posts/constantfolding-why-are-fp32-calls-folded-in-double-precision/</guid>
      <description>• [ConstantFolding] Why are FP32 calls folded in double-precision? • It recently came up inMaking sure you&amp;rsquo;re not a bot!that GCC was folding pow(x, 2.0)→x * x, even when doing so c</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
