<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Empathic on Tenu Tech Brief</title>
    <link>https://cluster-site.onrender.com/tags/empathic/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Empathic on Tenu Tech Brief</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.146.0</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 04:58:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://cluster-site.onrender.com/tags/empathic/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>When large language models are reliable for judging empathic communication</title>
      <link>https://cluster-site.onrender.com/posts/when-large-language-models-are-reliable-for-judging-empathic-communication/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 00:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://cluster-site.onrender.com/posts/when-large-language-models-are-reliable-for-judging-empathic-communication/</guid>
      <description>• Abstract Large language models (LLMs) excel at generating empathic responses in text-based conversations. • But, how reliably do they judge the nuances of empathic communication?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When large language models are reliable for judging empathic communication</title>
      <link>https://cluster-site.onrender.com/posts/when-large-language-models-are-reliable-for-judging-empathic-communication/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 01:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://cluster-site.onrender.com/posts/when-large-language-models-are-reliable-for-judging-empathic-communication/</guid>
      <description>• Nature Machine Intelligence, Published online: 11 February 2026; doi:10.1038/s42256-025-01169-6 Kumar et al. • show that large language models (LLMs) nearly match expert reliabil</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
