<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Constraints on Tenu Tech Brief</title>
    <link>https://cluster-site.onrender.com/tags/constraints/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Constraints on Tenu Tech Brief</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.146.0</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 07:59:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://cluster-site.onrender.com/tags/constraints/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Inline asm: canonicalizer does not respect `i` and `d` constraints</title>
      <link>https://cluster-site.onrender.com/posts/inline-asm-canonicalizer-does-not-respect-i-and-d-constraints/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 00:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://cluster-site.onrender.com/posts/inline-asm-canonicalizer-does-not-respect-i-and-d-constraints/</guid>
      <description>• Given the following LLVM MLIR dialect example (example.mlir ): llvm.func @f(%arg0: i16) { %0 = llvm.mlir.constant(64 : i16) : i16 %1 = llvm.mlir.constant(32 : i16) : i16 %5 = llv</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Case Study: Navigating VKS Upgrades - Balancing Infrastructure Constraints and Application Reality</title>
      <link>https://cluster-site.onrender.com/posts/case-study-navigating-vks-upgrades-balancing-infrastructure-constraints-and-application-reality/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 18:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://cluster-site.onrender.com/posts/case-study-navigating-vks-upgrades-balancing-infrastructure-constraints-and-application-reality/</guid>
      <description>• Kubernetes upgrades are often presented as straightforward, linear progressions: move from one version to the next, validate, and repeat. • This approach-commonly called the Sequ</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
