• Man arrested for demanding reward after accidental police data leak February 16, 2026 02:13 PM 1 Dutch authorities arrested a 40-year-old man after he downloaded confidential documents that had been mistakenly shared by the police and refused to delete them unless he received “something in return.” Police detained the suspect at his Prinses Beatrixstraat residence in Ridderkerk on Thursday evening for computer hacking after the failed extortion attempt, searching his home and seizing data storage devices to recover the files. • The incident began when the man contacted police on February 12 about images he had that may be relevant to an ongoing investigation. • An officer responded to his inquiry but, instead of sending a link to upload the images, mistakenly shared a download link to confidential police documents. • As first reported byDataBreaches.Net, the man downloaded the files despite the obvious error. • When the police instructed him to stop downloading and delete the materials, he allegedly refused unless he was given “something in return.” In a Monday press release, the Dutch police said that knowingly downloading files from a link clearly intended for uploading constitutes potential computer trespass under Dutch law, particularly when instructed not to access the materials. • “If you receive a download link, while you know that you should get an upload link, it is clearly said that it is not downloaded and chooses to download the files anyway, then you may be guilty of computer trespassing,“the police said.

Article Summaries:

  • Dutch authorities arrested a 40-year-old man after he downloaded confidential documents that had been mistakenly shared by the police and refused to delete them unless he received “something in return.” Police detained the suspect at his Prinses Beatrixstraat residence in Ridderkerk on Thursday evening for computer hacking after the failed extortion attempt, searching his home and seizing data storage devices to recover the files. The incident began when the man contacted police on February 12 about images he had that may be relevant to an ongoing investigation. An officer responded to his inq

Sources: