• Tech Gaming Los Angeles County Sues Roblox Over Ongoing Child-Safety Concerns The county alleges Roblox has engaged in deceptive business practices and is failing to protect children from predators. • Roblox introduced age-verification software as a requirement for some features, but Los Angeles County has filed suit, claiming the company’s efforts have not gone far enough to protect children on its gaming platform. • Roblox, the popular online gaming platform, is thetarget of a lawsuitfiled by Los Angeles Countyseeking an injunction and civil penalties for allegations of false advertising, engaging in unfair competition and allowing “the systemic sexual exploitation and abuse of children across the United States.” The suit, which follows changes and additions Roblox has made to its platform,including adding mandatory age verificationfor some features, is part of a barrage of legal action against gaming and social media platforms and how they handle use by teens and young children. • Los Angeles County is also the site of anongoing trial involving Metaover social media addiction. • Roblox responded to the allegations, telling CNET, “We strongly dispute the claims in this lawsuit and will defend against it vigorously. • Roblox is built with safety at its core, and we continue to evolve and strengthen our protections every day.” The company added that it has advanced safeguards to monitor content and communications.

Article Summaries:

  • Los Angeles County has filed an 82‑page lawsuit against Roblox, seeking an injunction and civil penalties. The suit accuses the gaming platform of false advertising, unfair competition and enabling systemic sexual exploitation of children nationwide. County counsel Dawyn R. Harrison argues that Roblox’s safety measures are inadequate and that the company markets itself as a safe space for minors while exposing them to harm through its design and monetization practices. Roblox disputes the claims, stating it has “safety at its core” and has added age‑verification tools and advanced content monitoring. The case follows a broader wave of legal action against social‑media and gaming firms over child‑safety concerns.

Sources: